Criminal Justice System of America and Britain Research Paper

Criminal Justice system of rules of America and Britain - Research Paper ExampleStill, there ar many differences and similarities betwixt the discriminatory systems in these countries. The first difference occurs, when American truthyers are defense attorneys, notwithstanding that they prefer to call themselves trial lawyers. British lawyers name them solicitors, representing peoples court-ordered needs and barristers, who take the cases to civil or criminal courts (Carter, 2001). The differences should be order not at the verbal level, but at much deeper conceptual and historical levels. Similarities and differences between the US and UK legal systems As far as we can see, there can be found a lot of parallels between English Common Law and the American legal system, many differences last as well. It is relevant to trace the deep historical roots of legal system of these countries, because the life of the law has not been logic, it has been experience...the law embodies the story of a nations development through many centuries... (Carter, 2001). There is no authoritative Court in the Great Britain and a government is positioned as a totally separated congruity from the legal process. The House of Lords performs a function of the highest justice and represents the court of highest appeal. (Carter, 2001) In America, state courts are separated from federal courts, but in Britain the lowest criminal courts Magistrates Courts exist.... In England there is Home Secretary, who is answerable for the criminal justice system and Wales and advising the Queen on the royal prerogative of mercy to pardon behave given to a person who is convicted of a crime. In accordance with the US Constitution, the President has a exponent of a pardon (of course, this mainly happens on the alkali of political considerations about the cases). Therefore, it is evident that legal and judicial systems are more separated from each other in the US. On the basis of the difference o f the legal systems in Britain and America, it is clearly seen that the US Constitution is the leading legal document in America. The Judiciary has the project over its own actions and the Executive or Legislative branches can obtrude in this process. Another interest fact is that the Executive branch is responsible for appointments of federal judges and judges in the Supreme Court. The sexual relation has a right to either approve or disapprove such kind of appointment. Therefore, on the basis of these facts the independence of the American judiciary can be questioned. The differences between judicial systems between these two countries occurred aft(prenominal) the Revolution, when American law became, in some ways, More than less English....The law later needed was not to be found in the colonial past....Only England had a supply that American lawyers could use without translation or transformation. (Knight, 1996) Still, the majority of lawyers and critics claim that the develo pment of the judicial system should be a more dynamical process. In order to accommodate republican versus monarchial system of Britain, America